When we understand something that is not possible to explain with usual terms/vocabulary, we have to search for innovative methods to explain insights. I really found difficulties in finding appropriate terminology to explain some concepts in some of my previous blogs. Therefore, I relied on Interactive Mind Debugging (i.e. a dialogue between a fictitious character and me where the real dialogue happens within upper layers of mind). The dialogue becomes more complicated if we debug into deeper layers of mind. The key idea is to streamline the reader's thought processes by engaging in a process of dialogue with the fictitious character, which could possibly enable them to understand the insights of the theory that I planned to explain. Isn't it complicated? Yes, I think there are better narrative styles to describe such concepts. This blog entry is to discuss one of them that belongs to 400 BC.
Recently, my curiosity drove me to read about "Analogy of the Cave" narrated by Socrates (Plato's mentor) when I was reading some insights of Plato's theories. I literally got goosebumps while reading about this analogy. Because the thought processes behind the explanations of my previous blogs (especially, Theory of mind: Reality vs illusion and Deep insights) are similar to the thought processes behind the discovery of this analogy. Its amazing to know that a philosopher who lived around 400 B.C. found a greatest analogy/metaphor to explain few things that are very difficult to explain with usual vocabulary (or a language).
According to Plato, Socrates many times used this metaphor/analogy to describe his philosophy with students. When the students questioned him about the unrealistic nature of the story, Socrates used to reply "Well, we are not different from the prisoners of the cave!". This answer gave me goosebumps once again.
So, what is real? what is an illusion? how do you make a distinction between reality and illusion? questions... so many questions...
Lets go one step further, imagine the prisoner fall into a sleep and getting a dream. What would appear in their dreams? Can they dream about shadows or real objects? When real objects are not in their memory representations, and when their imagination is not within the reach of the real objects, how can they dream about real objects? I think they can only dream about shadows, which are real according to them, but not real according to us.
Perhaps, the following is a valid storyline: The prisoners' beliefs are formulated on top their sensory perceptions (auditory and vision etc). As far as they concerned, its their world. They discuss, they formulate beliefs upon agreements of mutual understanding. They start making their own standards and concepts. Therefore, they try to predict. If something goes out of expectations, their curiosity goes up. They try to make a new theory to include those expectations.. its an ever going process...
I think I will remember this analogy forever. It seems that the reality and illusions are indistinct until we mutually agree each other upon the perceptions of the world. That might be the reason for the argumentation all of us are connected together, although everyone's world is formulated in one's own mind.
“The secret of change is to focus all your energy not on fighting the old, but on building the new.” ―Socrates
“As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.” ―Socrates
So, what is real? what is an illusion? how do you make a distinction between reality and illusion? questions... so many questions...
Lets go one step further, imagine the prisoner fall into a sleep and getting a dream. What would appear in their dreams? Can they dream about shadows or real objects? When real objects are not in their memory representations, and when their imagination is not within the reach of the real objects, how can they dream about real objects? I think they can only dream about shadows, which are real according to them, but not real according to us.
Perhaps, the following is a valid storyline: The prisoners' beliefs are formulated on top their sensory perceptions (auditory and vision etc). As far as they concerned, its their world. They discuss, they formulate beliefs upon agreements of mutual understanding. They start making their own standards and concepts. Therefore, they try to predict. If something goes out of expectations, their curiosity goes up. They try to make a new theory to include those expectations.. its an ever going process...
I think I will remember this analogy forever. It seems that the reality and illusions are indistinct until we mutually agree each other upon the perceptions of the world. That might be the reason for the argumentation all of us are connected together, although everyone's world is formulated in one's own mind.
Remembering Socrates:
“A system of morality which is based on relative emotional values is a mere illusion, a thoroughly vulgar conception which has nothing sound in it and nothing true.” ―Socrates
“The secret of change is to focus all your energy not on fighting the old, but on building the new.” ―Socrates
“As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.” ―Socrates